As is my want, I always respond with a terse opinion of spam when it appears to be a "real email address." His response is that some wacko bill in the US defines it as non-spam because it has unsubscribe tagged to the bottom.
Seeing as I am in Hong Kong, he needs to check the section of this country's legislation that discusses address harvesting and sending more than 100 emails in 24 hours. Spam is spam is spam. > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Don Leahy > Sent: Thursday, 24 May 2007 9:43 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN readership? > > I received one too. I spammed him right back by offering *him* the > services > of my (one-man) consulting firm. :-) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:18 PM > Subject: [META] Is WaveMind spamming entire IBM-MAIN readership? > > > >I just received two e-mails from WaveMind with the subject "Need help > > on your IBM Mainframe project?", one addressed to an address that I > > use only for IBM-MAIN. Nothing in the message suggests that it is in > > response to anything specific that I posted. Has anybody else received > > these? > > > > -- > > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
