On Wed, 30 May 2007 05:11:03 -0500, Norbert Friemel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 30 May 2007 01:18:18 -0500, Paul Schuster wrote: > >> >>I have a dataset defined in the PARMLIB member LNKLSTxx like this: >>dataset(volser) >> > >From Init & Tuning: > >"If you use LNKLSTxx instead of PROGxx, during IPL, the system opens and >concatenates each data set in the order it was listed, starting with the >first-specified LNKLSTxx member. The system creates a data extent block >(DEB) that describes the data sets concatenated to SYS1.LINKLIB and their >extents. The extents remain in effect for the duration of the IPL." > >"Instead of using LNKLSTxx to specify the LNKLST concatenation, consider >using PROGxx." > That fact that LNKLSTxx was being used went right past me. I'm surprised that anyone still uses it, but I've been around long enough to know that there are probably shops that never cut over to PROGxx LNKLST. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group: G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
