Rick:
Ah, change control. They all wanted it, implemented it, had backout plans
and all of the controls that management wanted, then management said it took
too long to get anything done on the mainframe.
Ya gotta love it!
Bill
From: Rick Fochtman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SETPROG LNKLST--problem or procedural error?
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 07:52:29 -0500
---------------------------<snip>--------------------
That fact that LNKLSTxx was being used went right past me. I'm surprised
that anyone still uses it, but I've been around long enough to know that
there are probably shops that never cut over to PROGxx LNKLST.
------------------------<unsnip>---------------------
Don't let that bother you, Mark. At Clearing, it took me 6 months of
paperwork battles to make the changeover, and that was 2 years after it was
available!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
_________________________________________________________________
PC Magazines 2007 editors choice for best Web mailaward-winning Windows
Live Hotmail.
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_pcmag_0507
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
