>You find our pedantry irritating. Not usually. But occasionally. :-) I'm sure I've been guilty now and then of being a little pedantic myself.
> (probably "we", but I can speak only >for myself) find your misuse of USS irritating. So it's a draw. > For the record, I don't use USS for Unix System Services in my posts (only when quoting someone else). I usually write "z/OS Unix" as I said in my last post - even when replying to a post that uses the unofficial abbreviation. But I do get tired of the whining about it and the endless threads. I think some people use it just to get a rise from those who don't like it. I sympathize with you that you think "VTAM" at first glance when you see it in a post, but it's really not worth debating. That was my point. So this will be my final word on the subject and the next time I will just ignore the thread or temptation to reply like I usually do. Cheers, Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group: G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
