Bruce, In this case, I think he meant by "authority" that the userid was not in a special userid filter list and that that filter list value is part of a compound test when testing for the presence of an explicit storclas specification. (wow, I typed a mouthful...LOL)
Bob Richards -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Black Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 3:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: explicity coding for STORCLAS & DATACLAS > > You may not have authority to specify the StorClass. I believe that a RACF violation on the Storclas name would result in an allocation failure. I believe that the only explanation is that his storclas ACS routine is checking for an input storclas (one specified by the caller as he did) and changing it to blank, which makes the dataset non-SMS. He needs to examine the ACS routine to see why this is happening. Bottom line is that every shop handles explicitly specified classes differently. LEGAL DISCLAIMER The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. SunTrust and Seeing beyond money are federally registered service marks of SunTrust Banks, Inc. [ST:XCL] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
