On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:37:17 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote: >What... no takers, no war? I'm disappointed. An *IBM representative* used >the "U" word not once, but twice. Does that mean it's officially ok to use >again casually when the context is clear? >
Someone posted this link on the LINUX list this morning: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/TDS390/SH19-4494- 06/en_US/HTML/drlb9mst389.htm (Mind the wrap) ...suggesting that this is some kind of clue to the future of UNIX System Services. My first thought was that I'm going to miss the semi-annual USS acronym/abbreviation/initialing controversy. Bummer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
