> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Andy White
>
> Im trying to find out from anyone out there who might be
> doing the same thing.
>
> We are planning for a disaster recovery site we
> control and mirror using XRC over distance. We currently have
> the JES2 check point for a few systems in a sysplex in an
> external CF, then the second check point is on DASD and in
> duplex mode. Its our understanding the second check point on
> DASD is and know its can be up to 10 writes off from the one
> in the CF. As a result if you are in this mode do you come up
> as warm or cold when it comes to JES2?
>
> We would like to come up warm so we don't loose work
> especially if a disaster should happen late during the batch
> run. Do you just come up and reconfigure using the back up
> check point from DASD being mirrored and just orphan the
> output not written to the check point? I mean if you loose a
> dozen or so output doesn't sound like a lot.
How about the case where, among the "dozen or so output" lost, was the
paycheck run?
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
