I forwarded the thread to a friend who was there at the time; here's his 
response.

...phsiii
=========
Cool!  Thanks.

My own addition would be in the category of what might be called "business 
history."  By the 1980s IBM was struggling in the mini and super-mini business. 
 IBM had 5 hardware platforms, 9 or 11 operating systems (depending on how you 
counted), and minimal marketshare.  DEC, DG, Wang, etc. were eating IBM's lunch 
in every market other than where purchases were controlled by the data center.  
Inside the data center, the large VAXes from Digital and the MV machines from 
DG were starting to threaten the mainframe crown jewels.

A collaboration of sorts between Boca (engineering) and Atlanta (sales) led to 
a device called the S/32.  This was intended to be a downward extension into 
the business market for minicomputers, building off the phenomenal success of 
the Rochester small business line:  S/3, S/34, S/36, and S/38.  The system came 
from Boca, outside of Rochester's control, but the sales driver was NMD, Boca 
and Rochester's sales arm in Atlanta.

That hardware box had all the engineering characteristics of the original PC - 
8088 processor, same storage options, 2 floppies - as I remember.  However, the 
software was closed.

Simultaneously, another part of Boca had been experimenting with at least 2 (I 
saw them), and maybe 3, commercial offerings that were squarely aimed at the PC 
market.

The Boca PC team was given the go ahead and cannibalized much of the S/32's 
hardware.  They produced a much more capable PC offering than the previous 
8-bit offerings.

I believe, unlike many of the comments in the thread, there was a business 
motive to the IBM PC.  It was to attack the minicomputers.  The attack was 
required because IBM's mainframes were being attacked from below by the minis.  
The correct business strategy was to attack the attackers from below with an 
even smaller / cheaper system.

Which is the end of the story, boys and girls.  For, while so many people focus 
on how the PC has damaged the mainframe, the mainframe still stands tall.  What 
the PC was meant to destroy, it did destroy - the minis and superminis.  DEC 
went from top of the heap (Queen Elizabeth in Boston harbor for DECWorld) to 
non-existence in less than 10 years.  DG is no more.  Wang is no more.  The PC 
destroyed them all.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to