On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 07:50:01 -0500, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hmmm.... Yes, it does say that after all.... Please accept my apology >for the too-superficial summary. > >But it appears "absolutely" true that CICS TS 3.2 *does require* a >MEMLIMIT greater than zero, where 2.3 and earlier did not; hence my >general question about a "suitable" system-wide default for MEMLIMIT. > > -jc- > The reason CICS TS 3.2 requires a MEMLIMIT greater than zero is because all CONTAINER storage is now held above the bar (think of it as a paging area). You don't have to explicitly use the CHANNEL/CONTAINERs API, either. Other parts of CICS (such as Web Services) use CONTAINERs internally. For most installations, 2G will be more than adequate for now. Tom Grieve CICS Development IBM Hursley Park P.S.No apology necessary, I'm glad you raised the topic in the first place. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
