If it seems I'm picking nits then just ignore me. (-: But I've been following this and trying to understand it and to be honest it doesn't always make sense.
May I ask, do you mean that IBM is being a jerk about FLEX because of the FSI situation? In other words, is this true: IBM had a problem with FSI, and because of this the FLEX AD/CD situation suffered as collateral damage. ? Lindy -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould Sent: 25. heinäkuuta 2007 3:36 To: [email protected] Subject: Z/Journal issue June/July 2007 Also, in Pete Clarks column there is a interesting discussion about the FSI/IBM business. Sounds like IBM is being an a** about FLEX. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
