On Jul 26, 2007, at 7:51 AM, Phil Kingston wrote:
You should be able to protect it with the RACF PROGRAM class?????
Phil Kingston
z/OS Systems Programming Consultant
Website www.zostek.com
Sigh... This was BEFORE that option was available. Please just
remember it JUST WASN"T ICKDSF it was a host of other "no-no"
programs that were in sys1.linklib. It was amaspzap and others.
Ed
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: 25 July 2007 19:00
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Secure clist
On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Phil Kingston wrote:
Then should you not protect ICKDSF itself?
How... at the time there was no security bult into ICKDSF.
If your authorised to run it in batch, then why not through TSO.
They weren't authorized to run it in batch.
Protect ICKDSF from unauthorised users rather than execs?
without writing exit code it was impossible, AFAIK.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
