Thanks. That's a thought. But what gets me is we did the same exact thing for another VSAM file (except we used a fully qualified name) and it worked no problem. The only difference was the OS level.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 11:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SMS Question - Urgent Dean, You might consider replacing (&UNIT EQ &DASD_UNITS)) with (&DSORG EQ 'VS')) A VSAM file is obviously allocated to DASD. If a user/programmer has used a variation of REFPROD.REFXXXX.DNO.** for a tape backup then the test will fail. ________________________________ From: Dean Montevago [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 8/21/2007 11:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SMS Question - Urgent FILTLIST DASD_UNITS INCLUDE('3390','SYSDA','SYSALLDA') FILTLIST TAPE_UNITS INCLUDE('3590*','MAGSTAR','T3590') FILTLIST DB2_VOL INCLUDE(* ) *****************************************************************/ /** PRODUCTION VSAM */ /*****************************************************************/ FILTLIST PRODVSAM INCLUDE(REFPROD.REFXXXX.DNO.**) WHEN ((&DSN EQ &PRODVSAM) AND (&UNIT EQ &DASD_UNITS)) DO SET &DATACLAS EQ 'PRODVSAM' WRITE '&DATACLAS SPECIFIED (' &DATACLAS ')' EXIT END ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
