On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:43:20 -0500, Paul Dineen wrote: > >If you think I should call this in as a bug to ACF2, I'll consider. Otherwise, >I'll ask my admins to keep defining the VVDS's as part of preparing new DASD. > >ACF99913 ACF2 VIOLATION-08,06,@QASMWR,PV240F,SYS1.VVDS.VPV240F
hmm.... apparently I was wrong. Sorry about that. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
