On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 01:34:03 -0700, arun kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The operator responded to the message as below, > > * IEA888A LOCAL DATE=2007.240,CLOCK=08.43.10 REPLY U, OR UTC/LOCAL TIME > IEE600I REPLY TO 00 IS;DATE=2008.001,CLOCK=08.45.00 > IEA888A UTC DATE=2007.240,CLOCK=08.44.07 > * IEA888A LOCAL DATE=2008.001,CLOCK=08.45.00 REPLY U, OR UTC/LOCAL > TIME > > Thanks to all those who responded. I could solve the problem by selecting sysplex timer and setting an timer offset in the image profile of the LPAR. Deactivated/activated test LPAR, IPL-ed the system with CLOCKxx > > OPERATOR NOPROMPT > > USS and TSO now both show future date. > Your original operator reply could have included "UTC" at the end: R 00,DATE=2008.001,CLOCK=08.45.00,UTC That would have set the "virtual" TOD clock for the LPAR. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
