On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:02:27 +0000, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>(Not that I agree with IBM's design choice here.) > >This has been discussed many times. >IBM's design choice is based on a simple premise: >When do you convert the system symbols? >On the submitting system? >On the converting system? >On the executing system? >What about NJE/NJP? > >Any choice can/will be wrong, so why open the can of worms? > >(Also, we can discuss this ad infinitem, but b*tching about it on IBM-Main is >not going to change anything. >Open a requirement with IBM --that makes business sense--, or drop the >discussion). > Thanx for all the advice. I was thinking that the previously discussed ad infinitem topic was relating to variables and or time/date stamps, etc. that can be used to construct a DSN, and NOT the actual *System Symbols*. My mistake and I apologize for that. Sorry. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
