IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> wrote on 09/03/2007 
02:15:40 AM:

> >So you almost always want exactly one and only Store Status for SAD
> >to capture.
> 
> >In real life, many shops take advantage of HMC wizardry to define SAD 
load
> >profile(s). These profiles must be different from regular OS load 
profiles
> >because the IPL device for SAD is never a sysres volume and may differ
> >from one LPAR to another. You have the option in an SAD load profile--
> >still, I think?--to set the Store Status option.
> 
> Yes, the option is still there.
> 
> >The temptation is to set it because this is by definition a SAD 
profile.
> >I used to do that until I was advised otherwise: if the first shot 
> at SAD >goes awry for some transitory and immediately correctable 
> reason, you DO >NOT want a second Store Status on retry. Only the 
> first Store Status, the >one from the OS, is of any use UNLESS you 
> trying to debug SAD itself. BTW >I have never once done that in my 
> whole career.
> 
> Well, this thread comes in handy. I have just generated (and tested)
> sadump for 1.8. And during testing, I clicked on the option for 
> store status (despite having read NOT to do it, as I was really 
> unsure). The sadump I then took was definitely readable and was NOT 
> a dump of an sadump. It was showing everything I expected it to 
> show, including all system address spaces that were up at the time.
> 
> I had been regenerating sadump from tape to DASD (dsntype LARGE), 
> and my first attempt went wrong due to operator error. I re-IPL'd 
> sadump (without store status, I think), and *that* was definitely a 
> dump of a dump (sadump even tells me so).
> 
> So I guess now I am really confused with the whole issue of store 
> status or not.

  When SADMP gets through its initialization and then goes awry and
you need to start over, the first thing to try is a PSW Restart.
If that works, it starts the dump over without losing any data.
If you do have to ReIPL SADMP, you will lose the 4 megabytes of
data for the frames which SADMP used for its code and buffers.
SADMP tries to use MVS read-only nucleus frames for this purpose,
and these are rarely required for debugging MVS problems. Since
they are read-only, we know what should be there, unless the 
problem was an overlay via a real address or channel program.
If you have to ReIPL SADMP on z/OS 1.8 or an older release,
SADMP will only dump real storage, and is unable to locate MVS
control blocks to allow it dump paged-out virtual storage.
I improved SADMP in z/OS 1.9 so that it can dump paged-out
storage if SADMP is reIPLed.

Jim Mulder   z/OS System Test   IBM Corp.  Poughkeepsie,  NY

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to