In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/03/2007
at 07:54 PM, "Joel C. Ewing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Maybe I'm missing something here, but isn't it highly dangerous to
>assume just because CSA/ECSA is "unowned" that it is also "unused" and
>not referenced by some address pointer somewhere?
No guts, no glory. It's a learning experience that will leave a far more
vivid memory than any number of lectures. Besides, it's not our dog.
IOW, you bet your sweet bippy it's dangerous.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
