At Clearing, we concluded that mirroring the Checkpoint via XRC was
inappropriate; ditto the Spool. Since all user-significant reports were
collected by our report distribution/management software, (INFOPAC), the
concensus was that mirroring INFOPAC volumes was adequate.
Internal-use-only reports would be re-created as needed. And we found
that many weren't really needed.
Rick
--------------------------------------
Andy White wrote:
Anyone out there mirroring their DASD either SRDF or XRC, i'd like to know
how you handle the JES2 check point.
We currently have our primary check point in the CF and second one
on DASD. We know they aren't in SYNC maybe a few writes behind on DASD. We
mirror using IBM XRC to another site for DR purposes. We are thinking of
taking both check pints and moving it to DASD so both check points are
mirrored.
I guess the basic question we are asking ourselves is it worth
putting the check point back on DASD and loose the benefit of the CF or
keep it where it is an the heck with a few pieces of output that might be
lost at the time of a disaster.
If your mirroring and have gone down this road what have you done
and why? Thanks
Andy
Internet: Mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is for the
intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the
information, or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
intended addressee, please notify the sender immediately and delete this
message.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
