On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:00:18 -0500, Walt Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> FYI... taking additional extents with SYSEXEC would NOT cause this problem. > >Even with the default of EXECUTIL EXECDD(NOCLOSE) in effect? Yes. Even though that is the default, I did purposely set it and tested to make sure. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
