On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:50:53 -0400, Imbriale, Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Prior to z/OS 1.6, IMAGE was an accepted keyword in the CUNUNIxx member >in PARMLIB. The syntax in CUNUNIxx has changed and the documentation >or 1.7 and 1.9 does not include a specification for IMAGE other than >ADD IMAGE, but IMAGE is still accepted as a valid keyword and processed >as expected. Is IMAGE an acceptable short-form substitute for ADD >IMAGE? Yes. That way, users didn't *have* to change anything if they didn't want to when they migrated to 1.7 (and above) and the same parmlib member could be shared between both system levels. Check out some past posts from Brian and Ken. You might also want to get SHARE session #2855 from SHARE in San Diego (Understanding z/OS Unicode Services). Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
