On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:10:24 -0500, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:50:53 -0400, Imbriale, Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Prior to z/OS 1.6, IMAGE was an accepted keyword in the CUNUNIxx member >>in PARMLIB. >Yes. That way, users didn't *have* to change anything if they >didn't want to when they migrated to 1.7 (and above) and the >same parmlib member could be shared between both system levels. > >Check out some past posts from Brian and Ken. You might also want >to get SHARE session #2855 from SHARE in San Diego (Understanding >z/OS Unicode Services). > >Mark >-- SHARE session 2817 from San Diego is a wonderful return on investment piece. Brian and a few others measured (pages used) the difference and it supports my claim DB2 loads a whopping number of images you do not need. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
