Hello there, this is a minor issue, but I still want to understand what's wrong with what HC says. We have three z/OS.e 1.7 LPARs in basic Sysplex. HC complains that :
'CNZHF0003I One or more consoles are configured with a combination of message scope and routing code values that are not reasonable.' The console which caused this low check severity to be issued is our Sysplex Master console, which I purposely defined with MSCOPE=*ALL and route codes (1-10,12-128). What's wrong with this ? I did the definitions a long time ago, so it might be that some guidelines or best practice are outdated. I thought a Sysplex master console *should* have MSCOPE=*ALL and its route code 1-10,12-128 were more than appropriate. HC has a different opinion, though. Anyone can shed some light on this ? TIA Walter Marguccio z/OS Systems Programmer Munich - Germany ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
