On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:15:20 +0200, Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >You can override the severity of the check, IIRC. But for this one-time-expected change I should not be required to override a lot of checks. > In a perfect world, perhaps. You don't *have to* override anything. It's also a one time action to deactivate the check or delete it with a simple line command on SDSF. Since it only applies to something that changed at IPL time, the next IPL will be okay and there is no exposure to leaving it inactive for the duration of this IPL. I wouldn't say it... but some might argue it's a good thing that it trips as "evidence" of your change. I have other tools that I would use to verify the change did what I expected... but not everyone has or knows how to use those other tools, so I still don't mind this one (and other similar checks) getting tripped and then just deleting it. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
