On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:29:38 -0500, Brian Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Absolutely NOT! Barbara's recent posts about specific checks are just what I >was hoping she and everyone else would start to do! > >Specific comments (positive OR negative) regarding specific Health Checks are >perfect. Such comments can result action - either informally the information >might filter back to IBM developers, or formally, a consensus might develop >and SHARE requirements might result. > >General whining about "this" and "that" is useless. > >Brian > CORRECT, a group consensus helps. The whiners just need to be ignored in that a Health Check is made for a reason. It may not be right for everyone, but it may right for someone. Comments help discern what value a check has and how many have a problem that it comes enabled by default. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
