------------------------<snip>---------------------
CORRECT, a group consensus helps. The whiners just need to be ignored in
that a Health Check is made for a reason. It may not be right for everyone,
but it may right for someone. Comments help discern what value a check has
and how many have a problem that it comes enabled by default.
------------------------<unsnip>-------------------
I disagree. Barb may very well be under pressure from management that
expects certain condition codes and messages. These same managers may
well fall under the category of "PHB" (pointy-head boss) and have very
little idea of what the messages and checks really mean.
For checks that may not apply in certain environments, there should be a
mechanism to disable the check, thus deleting the message and improper
return code. I think that there should also be a mechanism such that all
errors be classed as warnings, so the PHB can be kept "fat dumb and
happy". It's an unfortunate fact of life that sometimes know-nothing
managers are a bigger PITA than genuine system problems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
