> -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:04 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: z/OS 1.8 Conditional Storage Obtain/Getmain Return Code <Snipped> > We certainly did not (and would not) attempt to find and update the > multitude of SVC/PC/callable services to set 64-bit return codes.
<grumble-rant> PMFJI here, but why on earth not? I mean, aside from the sheer magnitude of the effort, which is NOT an excuse not to do it. Isn't this supposed to be a 64-bit OS? Why shouldn't ALL services of a 64-bit OS return 64-bit information codes? As part of the transition to a "real" 64-bit OS, why wouldn't it be the (or at least *a*) #1 priority to be sure all system interfaces were 64-bit-clean? I know, I know, "...waste of scarce developer resources..." -- but why are those resources so scarce? IBM is a multi-billion-dollar-profit corporation, so there is no fiscal excuse for scarce developer resources. And it's not like the talent is scarce either, it's just that we're closer to retirement age than makes HR departments happy. And we're not cheap labor either. </grumble-rant> Thanks for listening. Happy Friday. Peter This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
