Peter,
While you have a "somewhat" valid point, I think that IBM did a much
better job at backward compatibility with 31 <-> 64 bit than any others.
In most other 64 bit os's, to run 64 bit, most applications have to be
recompiled.  A 64 bit process space CANNOT invoke 32 bit services (they
just can't don't ask), so yes, while IBM could have done better, they
did document the fact that return codes are 32 bit values, did they not?
Just because some thinks make assumptions, the doc is clear.

Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE:  All opinions are strictly my own.


 

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 9:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: z/OS 1.8 Conditional Storage Obtain/Getmain Return Code

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Mulder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: z/OS 1.8 Conditional Storage Obtain/Getmain Return Code
<Snipped> 
> We certainly did not (and would not) attempt to find and update the
> multitude of SVC/PC/callable services to set 64-bit return codes.

<grumble-rant>
PMFJI here, but why on earth not?  I mean, aside from the sheer
magnitude of
the effort, which is NOT an excuse not to do it.  Isn't this supposed to
be
a 64-bit OS?  Why shouldn't ALL services of a 64-bit OS return 64-bit
information codes?  As part of the transition to a "real" 64-bit OS, why
wouldn't it be the (or at least *a*) #1 priority to be sure all system
interfaces were 64-bit-clean?

I know, I know, "...waste of scarce developer resources..." -- but why
are
those resources so scarce?  IBM is a multi-billion-dollar-profit
corporation, so there is no fiscal excuse for scarce developer
resources.
And it's not like the talent is scarce either, it's just that we're
closer
to retirement age than makes HR departments happy.  And we're not cheap
labor either.
</grumble-rant>

Thanks for listening.  Happy Friday.

Peter

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
addressee and
may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the
reader of the 
message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of
the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of
this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and
any
attachments from your system.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to