I don't believe an AX of 1 is the same thing as EAX authority to an address
space. At least that's my reading of the Extended Addressability Guide.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Binyamin Dissen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: ALESERV for an address space
Some of my trouble may have been due to an overlay.
At any rate, this I do not understand:
I cannot ALESERV ADD them unless I specify CHKEAX=NO.
Yet I can immediately used the returned ALET to access the storage, thus
proving that I do have EAX authority (which I should have, since I am
running
with AX=1).
Why is CHKEAX=NO required?
--
Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.
I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
