On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:30:34 -0500, Peter Relson wrote: > >Removing the ENQ is easy. Increasing the size of an existing data set for >which the system has obtained ENQs is not supported, and you do so at your >own risk. The ENQ's are in place so that you do NOT do this. > Apparently the key word here is "system". I tried the experiment and readily performed secondary allocation with a batch job (IEBGENER SYSUT2) while my TSO session had the DSH allocated SHR.
Does the system hold an exclusive ENQ to prevent this? -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
