In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/26/2007
at 10:52 PM, Ed Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I concur with your opinion. HOWEVER since IBM (last time I tried) does
>not make the requirements data base public it is difficult to figure
>out if something was proposed and how it fared voting wise at SHARE.
Further, public discussion helps in situations where IBM has told multiple
customers that they are the only ones with a requirement. There's nothing
like officially concurring with an existing requirement to blow that
excuse out of the water.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
