On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:27:46 -0500, Thompson, Steve wrote: > >So what is an ISV to do with a customer that does not use IEFUSI, or >does so incorrectly? > >My point of the LDA modification was not to give the APF code unlimited >virtual, but to allow the adjusting of PRIVATE (below the line) to have >the "reserved" area for LSQA. Theoretically, the developer(s) should >know how much LSQA and the like they would expect under some level of >"STRESSED" conditions (not necessarily SOS) and by changing the LDA, >cause that much to be held back. This way, the needed system C/Bs would >all be able to be acquired without the SYSTEM recognizing an SOS >condition and ABENDing where there is insufficient storage to build an >SDWA or some such.
Regardless of your reasons for mucking with the LDA, IMO it is a bad idea. You cause the address space to behave in unpredictable ways, perhaps casting suspicion on the IEFUSI exit. I believe that this kind of twiddling with the system is an inappropriate use of APF authorization. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
