On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:19:07 -0500 "Logan, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>I believe I understand the ETDEF options. Took me a bit, because the :>authorization and execution key parameters are a bit complicated. Why not show what you specified? :>But this fact remains: " The client only needs to issue an ATSET, which :>does require authorization." -- and as long as this is true, I need an :>SVC, since this seems to be the best way to get my client connected to :>my server. The ATSET only has to be issued for a non-system LX. :>If there is a better way than an SVC, I would love to hear about it. No need for one. :>Also, this means that there is no reason whatsoever to use a system LX, :>since I need to be in supervisor state anyway for the ATSET. I might as :>well go ahead after that and connect my LX/entry table at the same time. :>There is no way to get around the supervisor state requirement for :>client (i.e. problem program) setup. You do not have to issue a ATSET for a system linkage index. -- Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
