On 21 Dec 2007 11:03:47 -0800,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edward Jaffe) wrote:

>With an email client that understands hwo to properly handle URLs, no 
>extra effort is required. You simply post in the URL -- whether long or 
>short -- and it is not wrapped. For example, this should (hopefully) not 
>wrap:
>
>http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid80_gci1280330,00.html?track=NL-576&ad=611332&asrc=EM_NLT_2483474&uid=279318

I use Forte Agent version 4.2, and it had no problems with your URL.

However, Agent does _not_ seem to handle the wrapped URL in Ed G's
message:

><http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/general/ 
>0,295582,sid80_gci1286765,00.html? 
>track=NL-576&ad=617990&asrc=EM_NLN_2777580&uid=6570353>

that triggered my response.

After a little digging, I noticed that Ed G's message contained the
header:

  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed

The first two text lines containing the URL contain trailing blanks,
the third line does not. So Ed G's message does appear to be properly
formatted for RFC 3676, Content-Type "text/plain", "delsp=yes" and
"format=flowed". Any newsreader/e-mail client that correctly supports
RFC 3676 should remove the trailing blanks and concatenate all three
lines into one.

Clicking on that wrapped URL in Agent, Thunderbird tried to go to the
URL:

 http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/general/0,295582,sid80,00.html

So, it looks like Agent did process the wrapped lines more or less
correctly, but then decided to stop parsing the URL after the ".html"
text. I guess that might be considered a bug in Agent, but I'm not
sure there's an RFC defining how e-mail clients should interpret a
character string that might be a URL. Obviously, "http://"; is a pretty
good clue to the start of the URL. I guess Agent took a bit of a
shortcut when trying to determine the end of the link.

After reading all of the responses to my initial note, I've come to
feel that putting both the full URL and a tinyurl link in a message is
a reasonable compromise. Yes, I understand that tinyurl links do have
some security exposures, but in a small community like IBM-Main, I'm
willing to be pretty trusting.

After all, whatever one might think of Ed G's technical contributions
to this group, or his opinions of IBM, I don't believe he is at all
malicious!

Eric

--
Eric Chevalier                          E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                           Web: www.tulsagrammer.com
    Is that call really worth your child's life?  HANG UP AND DRIVE!

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to