David:
Yes, That's what I was thinking.... Bill> Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 06:07:51 -0700>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: C++ recovery from (an otherwise) system
abend> To: [email protected]> > I'm using assembler along with C. What
"environment" did you have in mind?> Perhaps an ESTAE that's set just before
the PC and cleared just after?> > David Logan> > -----Original Message----->
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf> Of
Bill Wilkie> Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2008 2:22 PM> To: [email protected]>
Subject: Re: C++ recovery from (an otherwise) system abend> > I haven't done
any work on the MF in this regard so forgive me if I am all> wet here, but on
the PC side, I know you can intersperse PC assembler in the> C++ code to
implement low-level operations. Is that possible on the MF side?> If so, you
may be able to set up the environment you are looking for. Just a> thought. > >
> Bill> Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:54:03 -0600> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
Subject: Re: C++ recovery from (an otherwise) system abend> To:>
[email protected]> > David, > > have you tried a LE-Condition-handler>
instead of catch()? I believe a > C catch() wont work for an LE enabled>
assembler program. > Did you get a CEEDUMP with the abend code?> Have you>
tried a USRHDL or register a Condition handler?> > roland> > > >The main>
problem with this solution (or any other solution) that checked> >something>
before I make the PC call is that the server could crash (or be> >brought>
down) between the check and the PC call.> >> >Were I to implement something>
like the solution you describe, I would hope> >that I could either use the> get
name/token pair routine to check to make> >sure the server is up, or> perhaps
be able to check for existence of the> >servers ASCB or TCB, so that> I didn't
need to place anything into common> >storage.> >> >What I was> hoping for was a
solution where there was no chance of> >intermittent> failure. The only way I
know of to support that would be to be> >able to> trap the ABEND. Is there
really no way to issue an ESTAE type of> >recovery> routine in C++ and return
control to some function or something> >similar?>> >> >Thanks!> >> >>
----------------------------------------------------------------------> For>
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,> send email to>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO> Search the> archives at
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html> >
----------------------------------------------------------------------> For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,> send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO> Search the archives at
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html> >
----------------------------------------------------------------------> For
IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,> send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO> Search the archives at
http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
