Void handler is defined in the same source as the rest of the code at this point. However, I cannot imagine how putting it in its own source would change anything, unless somebody else knows of a reason.
David Logan -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 9:28 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: C++ recovery from (an otherwise) system abend David Logan wrote: > All good questions. How it did not work was that none of my printf > statements were generated, and the S0D6 occurred anyway. > > I know the CEEHDLR is registering my routine because I was getting a message > 256, meaning it was already registered, and was being re-registered. > > I'm thinking an ESTAE might work. I would have to restrict it to returning > to a spot within the assembler code doing the PC instruction, but that's all > I really need. > > The code is: > > void handler(_FEEDBACK *fc, _INT4 *token, > _INT4 *result, _FEEDBACK *newfc) > { > printf("tok_sev =%d\n", fc->tok_sev); > printf("tok_msgno=%d\n", fc->tok_msgno); > printf("tok_case =%d\n", fc->tok_case); > printf("tok_sever=%d\n", fc->tok_sever); > printf("tok_ctrl =%d\n", fc->tok_ctrl); > //printf("tok_facid=%3.3s", fc->facid); > //printf("tok_isi =%d\n", fc->isi); > *result = 10; > } > > <...unrelated code...> > > int server_read(int handle, int block_number, void*dest_buffer) > { > > _FEEDBACK fc; > _ENTRY routine; > _INT4 token; > > token = 99; > > routine.address = (_POINTER)&handler; > routine.nesting = NULL; > CEEHDLR(&routine, &token, &fc); > if( _FBCHECK(fc, CEE000 ) != 0 && > _FBCHECK(fc, CEE080 ) != 0) > { > printf("CEEHDLR failed with message number %d\n", fc.tok_msgno); > exit(2999); > }; > > char workareaÝ256¨; > long ecb = 0; > int ascb = *(int*)0x224; > int rc = 0; > DEBUG2("2/Our ECB=%p ASCB=%p\n", &ecb, (void*)ascb); > do > { > rc=CallPC(data.lx_value, > 1, handle, block_number, dest_buffer, > data.data, workarea, &ecb, ascb); > } > while(rc != 1126); > return rc; > } Well, I have to admit it all looks proper. One question: was "handler" in the same source module as your main? I've never seen a condition handler in the same source; I've always seen it separately compiled and bound. Kind regards, -Steve Comstock The Trainer's Friend, Inc. 303-393-8716 http://www.trainersfriend.com z/OS Application development made easier * Our classes include + How things work + Programming examples with realistic applications + Starter / skeleton code + Complete working programs + Useful utilities and subroutines + Tips and techniques ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
