On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 14:58:41 -0500, Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... >Well, if you are not under an NDA you certainly can deny the existence of an >NDA. > >So, if you ask X if he is under an NDA: > > Response: No - No NDA > No response: - NDA >... I don't believe any NDA morally binds you to tell the truth. You can lie. Say "No" whether you are under an NDA or not. IBM may have several different flavor of such things, but as far as I know IBM calls them "Confidential Disclosure Agreement" - CDA. So you could truthfully say youu are not under an NDA. The only kind of CDA I've seen has been the kind relating to ESPs & Beta programs. Under those I was not supposed to mention that the program existed ... even in PMRs for the currently supported product! (My Extra Sensory Perception tells me this bug will still exist in the next release.) Sometimes the restriction make no sense, but they should still be followed. Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
