>LDR? You mean the 580 series. The base machine was a 5860. The 5850 was a slower model
LDR - law of diminishing returns. >>With each domain the cache would be allocated as a fixed amount, and was not dynamic. >>So, the cache from one domain was completely isolated from another. >>No impact. >No, it didn't work that way. It was a kind of large cache with a higher way >associavity than was common, IIRC, but cache was not dedicated to a domain and >isolated from other domains. When I was responsible for a beta test of MDF, when it first came out, I was told that the cache line was split evenly across domains. And, it was partitioned and dedicated to each domain. This was from very experienced Amdahl reps. .. But, if you know better ..? - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
