In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/07/2008
at 09:29 AM, J R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>ISTR that ISPF edit's SYSDSN ENQ behaves differently
>for a sequential dataset versus a member of a PDS.
SYSDSN is Allocation, not ISPF. I believe that what you are seeing is that
for sequential data sets ISPF allocation with disposition OLD but for PDS
it allocates with SHR. ISPF does it's own ENQ's to serialize updates to
PDS members.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
