> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 2:15 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: JES2 NJE question: SNA(CTC) vs. TCPIP > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:48:59 -0800, Gibney, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >... > > That was the whole point, John doesn't need his Network folks > >permission or to even tell them if he uses a private IP address for > >Hipersockets inside one CEC !!! > >... > > Not necessarily true. If the Hipersockets connections are part of the > routable network - e.g., if some of the TCP/IP stacks can be reached > only by these Hipersockets connections - the Hipersockets IP addrs > or subnets will need to be advertised to the rest of the (local) IP > network. > > It certainly makes sense for private IP addrs to be used for the > Hipersockets connections, but use of these addrs very definitely > should be coordinated with Network folks. They may not care, or > they may care very much! > > Pat O'Keefe >
Well, yes, but under the subject question. JES2 NJE, CTC or TCPIP, it is reasonable to ASSUME that these addresses can and should be (at least as a starting point) established without advertisement (DNS?) and on their very own subnet. At least that's how I did it. I did ask my friendly network guy and he approved. But in absence of friends, function can still be established. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
