On Tue, 4 Mar 2008 14:34:03 +0100, Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>good catch! I don't suppose oa20749 will correct this oversight, too? My understanding was that it should be enough to define devices with WLMPAV yes in the HCD. We have this but I don't know how to check if it helps. The aliases are surely not fix assigned to page data sets or there is an error in the RMF DEV Device Activity display (we have 1.0H in the PAV column for all devices). -- Zaromil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
