We have a GRS environment using XCF (ie not using a CF) with three LPARS connected. We had changed the RESMIL value to OFF to try and improve responsiveness. That worked, but the XCFAS address space CPU consumption went up. We decided to change the RESMIL value to 0 since that does leave the tuning mechanism working. The manual indicates that RESMIL can be changed on any LPAR independent of the others. One LPAR was changed, leaving the other two set to OFF. It looks as if changingthe RESMIL value to 0 in one LPAR has reduced the CPU consumption in the XCFAS address space in all LPARS. Question is: Is that to be expected, or do we need to look for something else?
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
