> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 8:56 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Tape switching: Autoswitch vs MIM/Allocation > > > --------------------<snip>--------------------- > > >I know that MIM/Allocation is more powerful in that it can > span multiple > >sysplexes and has more options. However, in a single basic sysplex > >environment with only two members, it is really worth my > while to set up > >MIM/Allocation? We have it because we use MIM/Integrity (mainly to > >automatically hold/requeue/release jobs with DATASET IN USE). > > > >More curious than anything else. > > > > > --------------------<unsnip>--------------------- > I wouldn't bother.
That seems to be the consensus. In any case, I can start with autoswitch and always implement MIA later if there is some good reason. Right now, I'm busy enough just trying to get this mess off the ground. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
