On 14 Mar 2008 09:25:06 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >On 14 Mar 2008 06:28:28 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main >(Message-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Russell) wrote: > >>>Is there a way to restrict jobs from running it a >>>particular job class? >>Is >>>there >>>more than one way and if so, what is the easiest? TIA >> >>I did this with IEFUJI, as it prevents users from changing >>the jobclass after it has been submitted. > > So, a user submits a job in a 3rd-shift class and >goes home. 3rd shift starts, and the job abends because >he's not authorized for that class. > > I prefer an immediate check and notification. An >exit in SDSF takes care of most user attempts at changing >jobclass. I'd rather let any other attempts go through >than have the above scenario which punishes an honest >mistake.
My solution in 1988 was to set the job class in exit 6 based on time, the number of tape drives (up to 3), the TCAM queue requested if any and type of user. If the system knows what job class is allowed, I felt the system should set it and not bother the user with one more thing to remember. I believe the exit is in file 432, Philips Mods on the CBT tape. Clark Morris ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
