On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:11:04 -0400, Lizette Koehler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... >I have been working with CA but they say it is a vtam error. I understand >that the 0821 is from VTAM but I believe it is coming from something that is >happening between TPX and CICS logons. >... The BIND reject with the 0821 sense is being issued by CICS. VTAM just reports it. The CA people are right that it is not (exactly) a TPX problem, but it is not a VTAM or CICS problem, either. We have TPX but I am not familiar enough with it to know if/how it sets a LOGMODE name on the session request, or if it simply lets VTAM use the DLOGMOD parm on the VTAM APPL def for the LU name in question. However these session parameters are set, CICS does not like them. Hence the 0821. You need to find out what is being set, what CICS expects, and how to reconcile the 2. If there are no CICS messages being issues, you will have to work with your CICS gurus to see how to correct that. CICS can issue messages the give pretty good clues when it issues an 0821. I think it at least points to the byte in the BIND image that it doesn't like. Or if it is an Autoinstall problem, it can issue a message showing why it could not perform the install. >... This >is the only issue I have at this time. The 0821 for a handful of users. I >am not seeing any additional error messages in CICS log that would help me >understand this issue. > >I have run a TPX trace, but do not really understand what I am looking >at or for. >... I really don't think the TPX trace is going to show much. It may show the LOGMODE name and/or BIND image used inthe session request, but it is not going to say why CICS did not like it. Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
