On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:25:01 -0500, Rugen, Len <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm doing some planning for a end-of-life for the mainframe conversion >project, as in the 9th year of our 5 year plan to get off this system. > > > >We have View Direct / Mobius report viewer. It has 100,000's of HSM >migrated files in our 3494 library. If they just issue recalls for >these in some order they choose, the physical tape and file order will >be random and slow. On a good day, 500 recalls would probably be the >max we could allow before we would need the drives for overnight >production. I think when I did the math, it was 3-4 years worth of >recalls. (That's OK, I need this job :-) ) > > > >Is there a faster way? If I had a list of files they wanted, could I >send the recalls in tape - file sequence somehow to "batch" them? > > > >Thanks > > > >Len Rugen > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html Possibly the LIST TTOC command may provide an information source you can sort, manipulate and generate HRECALL commands, using REXX, DFSORT/SYNCSORT? Obviously, a straight HRECALL with a LEVEL parameter is a comparison test to perform, which should not be used -- right? Check the useful tips page, LasCon Storage - DFHSM Dataset Level Commands, at the link below: http://www.lascon.co.uk/d015401.htm Scott Barry SBBWorks, Inc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
