We did this, long ago far away, at our time share NVIP, IBM 3880-11 w/3350's. I'm with you on this Ted, I always liked to keep this, paging environment, simple as possible with paging with own volume. This may be a bit of old school thinking but when there are problems or potential data management issues I know straight away what it most probably is not. But at this point horses for courses, if you will.......
Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >There was a time that the recommendation was to put paging data sets on dedicated volumes attached to dedicated control units. I've never seen anyone do that with ordinary DASD. I did it 3330's, 3350's, & 3380's from 1981 to 1989. Dedicated DASD, control units and channels. With 3390's, and quad pathing, we started getting away from dedicated paths and control units. But, we kept dedicated packs. I'm still biased towards the last one. (Except for the 1-Cyl PLPA 'trick') - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
