On Tue, 13 May 2008 20:49:44 +0100, Martin Packer wrote: >You're NOT differing. :-)
What's that supposed to mean? I replied to your post that issues with Javascript were a thing of the past, if I understood correctly. This came up a few months ago and that was when I installed NoScript. It has made a _big_ difference for me. This thread got started because you and one or two others claimed that there is no reason to disallow Javascript. You did say that, didn't you? Even if I do choose to allow Javascript for some site, it certainly does not mean that I want the banner advertisements served up by that site to run their flashy scripts. > >>I beg to differ. Until recently, I was running Firefox without NoScript >>and >>frequently found that both and swap space had filled up, requiring >>that Firefox >>be recycled (at a minimum) or that Linux be rebooted. I keep my >>software up >>to date. >> >>With the installation of Noscript, and enabling Javascript only when >>I need it, >>those problems seem to be a thing of the past. At the very least, >>they are far >>less frequent. >> -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
