On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:52 AM, McKown, John
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<SNIP>
> P.S. I am not as convinced as the programmer that the problems he is
> encountering are due to the AMODE. But he is insistant and has the
> political backing to force the issue. The only way to prove otherwise to
> allow him to do his work in AMODE(24) and see if he still has the same
mu> problems. He has already done a lot of "figure out this for me" type
> requests to Tech Services.
>

Has he tried using DATA(24) in his Enterprise Cobol compiles?  In my
limited experience, that usually does the trick when calling old
subroutines.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to