Okay. Sorry for resonding to my own post, but I never saw the original problem statement, until it was echoed in a subsequent post. I still believe AMODE(24) is passé, but now I know the reason.
- Too busy driving to stop for gas! -----Original Message----- From: Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:21:21 To:[email protected] Subject: Re: insane request: force load module to RMODE(24) AMODE(24) >... The programmer doing this is convinced that a/the >major problem is that Enterprise COBOL links as AMODE(31). He wants to >force the load module to AMODE(24). Why would anybody want to run in AMODE(24) in this day and age? As anybody told the programmer to get into the new millenium? - Too busy driving to stop for gas! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
