On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:15:00 -0500, Andrew Metcalfe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>.. but I guess that all systems in the subset have to be converted to have >the new file systems e.g. sysplex root and version? Not true. >and the sysplex root has >to be AUTOMOVE. Yes, for the participating systems. >Whilst this may work technically, I feel that I might be >buying into a whole stack of trouble! > Not if you implement it properly. >This will be difficult to implement given our standard build where we install >once and ship many standard z/OS systems based on it. As none of us are >getting any younger, I am trying to reduce complexity rather than introduce >some bespoke processing that will trip up our succesors! > I do the same thing. I even share the same physical sysres set between sysplexes that have shared file systems and ones that don't (including some monplexes). Although I don't have any sysplexes that only do partial sharing... but I may be doing that in the near future - at least temporarily in order to satisfy a sharing requirement. Have you read the doc? http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/BPXZB271/8.0?SHELF=E0Z2IN71&DT=20070122154602 Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
